(Click to invert colors, weenie.)
(Requires JavaScript.)
Scroll down for Prelinger stuff Email: darkblogules at yahoo dot com
All email will be assumed to be for publication unless otherwise requested.
What's in the banner?
Father of Bloggers
InstaPundit We. Are. Not. Worthy. James Lileks Your Tour Guides to the Abyss Charles Johnson Damian Penny Intel Rantburg Aussie Oppressor Team Bleah! Punk Author Dr. Frank Insolent Woman Natalie Solent People who still read this blog for some reason Alien Corn Gother than thou Ghost of a Flea Prelinger Stuff Introducing the Prelinger Archive Tuesday in November Make Mine Freedom Prelinger Writes In! Freedom Highway Mental Hygiene The Snob Prelinger's web site The on-line Prelinger Archives Mental Hygiene by Ken Smith |
Thursday, July 12, 2007
Posted
9:08 AM
by Angie Schultz
Sockpuppet in ChiefI spent a year in Pasadena[1] one week, and I got my lunch at the nearby Wild Oats Market (which the natives referred to as Wild Goats). Ordinarily I don't go in for that "organic" crap -- figuring that it's chock full of bug parts and e coli -- but Wild Goats was close and its deli had a variety of interesting dishes that weren't egregiously self-satisfied and politically correct. So I was mildly interested (and dismayed) when Niles read me an item in the business section about how Whole Foods had closed a deal to buy Wild
"Rahodeb" is an anagram for Deborah, the name of Mackey's wife. At least Rahodeb didn't disavow his interest in Whole Foods:
But he did talk about himself in the third person:
and
Maybe it was his magic boyfriend. Now, I'm not a business tycoon like Mackey, so it would appear to me that not only is this lame and petty, it really isn't a good use of a CEO's time. Furthermore, the post in the first quote above -- dismissing the possibility of Whole Foods buying Wild Oats "at its current price" -- was made in January 2005, when Wild Oats stock was $8 a share. Two years later, Whole Foods actually did buy Wild Oats at $18.50 a share. To your average uninformed amateur layperson blogger, it looks as if Mackey's one-man campaign backfired, big-time. Maybe I should have titled this "Business Ideas That Work" (with a nod to Agent Bedhead). Turns out though, that although sockpuppetting (and losing money while doing it) makes you look like a dick, it isn't actually illegal. The FTC is suing, though. [SEE UPDATE] Often on blogs I see someone (metaphorically) beating a dead (or living) horse, and I think they're just obsessed. Usually, someone else will accuse them of being a paid shill, and I always think that's nuts. Who the hell would pay good money for someone to run down or build up a company/idea/President on a blog, fer chrissakes? I guess now we know. I gotta get me some of that action. [1]California UPDATE 7/17/07: The FTC is suing to block the Wild Oats takeover on anti-trust grounds, not because of the sockpuppeting. The Captain's Quarters points to this NYT story, which says that the FTC is just doing an informal inquiry. You won't read that in the main body (where it says "formal inquiry") -- it's in the correction at the bottom of the page.
|