(Click to invert colors, weenie.)
(Requires JavaScript.)
Scroll down for Prelinger stuff Email: darkblogules at yahoo dot com
All email will be assumed to be for publication unless otherwise requested.
What's in the banner?
Father of Bloggers
InstaPundit We. Are. Not. Worthy. James Lileks Your Tour Guides to the Abyss Charles Johnson Damian Penny Intel Rantburg Aussie Oppressor Team Bleah! Punk Author Dr. Frank Insolent Woman Natalie Solent People who still read this blog for some reason Alien Corn Gother than thou Ghost of a Flea Prelinger Stuff Introducing the Prelinger Archive Tuesday in November Make Mine Freedom Prelinger Writes In! Freedom Highway Mental Hygiene The Snob Prelinger's web site The on-line Prelinger Archives Mental Hygiene by Ken Smith |
Sunday, October 30, 2005
Posted
8:42 AM
by Angie Schultz
UPDATE: See bottom of post. Niles and I laughed the other day when we read this article:
Are there Americans who really give a damn about whether there's a Queen Camilla? I mean, there may be a few rabid Anglophiles who take this a lot more seriously than the British do; and then there are the avid readers of the National Enquirer, who are also deeply concerned about whether their pets' quarters are properly feng shuied; and finally there are those who are informed enough to know to shake their heads when reading about the royals in the Fluffy News snippets in the newspaper (right next to the current starlet marriage league tables). The latter group don't really care, and the former two groups are surely very small. In any case, Americans are kind of out of the loop as far as approval of British royalty goes. As some of us keep pointing out, we fought a war to make sure we'd never have to care again. Surely you've read about it. It was in all the papers. But, let's assume for the moment that the opinions of the 5% of Americans who give a damn are really really important to C&C, that somehow their approval will persuade Britons that they ought to accept Camilla as queen. Given that, we see that Charles has exhibited the keen sense of PR that the current crop of British royals is known for, and is planning to lecture Bush about being a mean old bazootyhead to those poor Muslims:
Right, like all those concentration camps and Koran burnings and lynchings and whatnot. Or maybe it's just that we still openly allow piggy banks to be displayed, in front of Allah and everybody. The future head of the Anglican Church (where he'll fit right in) goes on:
Unlike those nice mullahs in Iran, with their Great Satans and their martyrs and their rivers of blood and so forth. Good job, Charles. It's a just as well no one here really cares or matters, or you couldn't sneak Charwoman Camilla into Buckingham Palace. That Telegraph article states that Charles is actually trying to woo the American media to the Camilla camp, in which case the Islam PR campaign makes much more sense. Anybody who scolds George Bush will be a hero to them. UPDATE: According to the Australian program Media Watch, as reported by Tim Blair, the piggy bank ban story was "hogwash". Also, Sky News reports that when asked about the upcoming tour of Charles and Camilla, 81% of Americans breathlessly asked, "Who?" Just as I suspected. (I didn't suspect that Sky could have such a sucky website. Their news crawl is making some of their ads flash off and on in my browser. Animals. Couldn't find a print-friendly version.)
|